The quality of the script, I saw the Italian version with English subtitles, is thoroughly decent, and hits more than it misses. (If there is one place that I would love, love, LOVE to go to it is Italy, not only for the food but for the opera as well.) The story is an effective and affectionate one, about a Jewish man who falls in love with the help of his humour, but has to do the same to protect his son in the Nazi concentration camp. The costumes look amazing and the Italian landscapes look breathtaking. That said, there are a lot of truly good things about Life is Beautiful. Most notably Guido and Giosue trying to communicate to Dora over the loudspeaker, and the ending did have me in tears. While the character of Guido "amusingly" tries to convince his son Giosue that life in the concentration isn't so bad, the second half's tone has a lot of poignancy. The film changes tone to a more poignant, compelling and harrowing second half, that I think was much needed. Though I will say that Benigni's tribute to comedy greats like Charlie Chaplin and Groucho Marx was inspired. That is perfectly acceptable, but because there was a lot of charm in the performances and the production values it felt slightly overdone. It also works very hard, to provide charm. Some of it is very funny, but some of the slapstick humour didn't work as well as it should, namely eggs breaking on people's heads. I just want to clarify that I didn't hate the first half. And in my humble opinion, the second half was better than the first. So what didn't make this film perfect? Well, as I have stated at least twice already, it is uneven. Well, maybe a tad, but I can really see why people like this movie. I asked myself after watching Life is Beautiful, is it really overrated. It is uneven, and there were parts that didn't work as well as intended, but this is a brave and affectionate realisation of life during the Holocaust.
YOUTUBE LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL FULL MOVIE FREE MOVIE
Just for the record, I did like the movie very much.
While in general it is very highly regarded, there have been those who have said it is overrated or whatever. He rightly deserved the Oscar for Best Actor for all his charm, enthusiasm and magnetism.īefore I eventually saw this film, I was not sure whether I was going to like it or not.
This film, though VERY cleverly written, was carried by Benigni's marvelous acting. Despite the ludicrousness of the plot at this point (hiding a little boy in a men's dormitory in a prison camp), the way they explain it works out perfectly and should not offend or diminish from the horrors that were the holocaust. Occasionally, there were some mildly humorous moments but the goal was not a cheap laugh but were desperate attempts to convince the child that he should not give up hope. The second half of the movie does indeed take place in a prison camp. These moments also abound with charm and seem rather reminiscent of the work of Chaplin-lots of physical humor and charm. I found myself laughing out loud on many occasions with the silly buffoonery of Benigni as he tries to capture the heart of a woman he keeps "bumping into".
This makes sense and allows the movie to be in good taste. Well, first, most of the humor in the film occurs BEFORE the internment. Before I watched this film, I was a bit hesitant because the basic premise sounds so ridiculous-a man who uses humor and imagination to shield his son from the horrors of the holocaust while in a concentration camp! I mean, how can this movie be funny? Is this another "Hogan's Heroes" or what, I thought.
0 kommentar(er)
